The impact of germline BRCA pathogenic variants in locally advanced, triple negative breast cancer treated with platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Whether germline BRCA (gBRCA) pathogenic variants (PV) affect prognosis of women with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and whether it has implications for treatment decisions in the neoadjuvant setting is unclear. METHODS: This is a retrospective two-center cohort study comprising all women with early stage TNBC who have completed genetic testing and were treated with neoadjuvant dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin. All eligible patients treated between 10.2014 and 3.2020 were included. Data on clinico-pathological, pathological response, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated. Differences in clinico-pathological features and outcomes were analyzed according to gBRCA status. RESULTS: Sixty-four women were included in the final analysis, of which 31 had gBRCA PV (gBRCA carriers) and 33 were gBRCA wild-type. Clinico-pathological characteristics were similar between both groups. The odds for pathological complete response (pCR) were significantly higher in gBRCA carriers (74.2%) compared to BRCA wild-type women (48.5%), p = 0.035. At a median follow-up of 30 months, gBRCA carriers had significantly favorable OS (HR = 8.64, 95% CI 1.08-69.21, p = 0.042). The difference in DFS did not reach statistical significance (HR = 7.4, 95% CI 0.91-60.27, p = 0.062). The favorable OS for gBRCA carriers remained significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.029) and was noted regardless of pathological response (p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Compared to wild-type, gBRCA carriers with locally advanced TNBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing carboplatin had a higher pCR rate and better outcomes. These results strengthen the contention that gBRCA status should be considered when tailoring treatment decisions in women with locally advanced TNBC.

Clinical outcomes in estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer patients with Recurrence Score 26-30: observational real-world cohort study.

Data on adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) benefit in ER + HER2‒ early-stage breast cancer (EBC) patients with Recurrence Score (RS) 26-30 are limited. This real-world study evaluated the relationships between the RS, adjuvant treatments, and outcomes in 534 RS 26-30 patients tested through Clalit Health Services (N0: n = 394, 49% CT-treated; N1mi/N1: n = 140, 62% CT-treated). The CT-treated and untreated groups were imbalanced (more high-risk clinicopathologic characteristics in CT-treated patients). With median follow-up of 8 years, Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival (OS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and BC-specific mortality (BCSM) were not significantly different between CT-treated and untreated N0 patients. Seven-year rates (95% CI) in CT-treated vs untreated: OS, 97.9% (94.4-99.2%) vs 97.9% (94.6-99.2%); DRFS, 91.5% (86.6-94.7%) vs 91.2% (86.0-94.6%); BCSM, 0.5% (0.1-3.7%) vs 1.6% (0.5-4.7%). For N1mi/N1 patients, OS/DRFS did not differ significantly between treatment groups; whereas BCSM did (1.3% [0.2-8.6%] vs 6.2% [2.0-17.7%] for CT-treated and untreated patients, respectively, p = 0.024).

Taxane versus vinorelbine in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab for first-line treatment of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer: a retrospective two-center study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of a taxane with trastuzumab and pertuzumab is standard of care for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. The combination of vinorelbine with trastuzumab and pertuzumab showed anti-tumor activity in a phase 2 trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The databases of two tertiary medical centers were retrospectively searched for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who underwent first-line treatment in 2013-2019 with a taxane or vinorelbine in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Groups were compared for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profile. RESULTS: The study included 87 patients in the taxane group and 65 in the vinorelbine group. Overall median PFS was significantly longer in the taxane group [HR 0.56 (0.36-0.88), P = 0.01], but on multivariate analysis the difference was not statistically significant [HR 0.68 (0.4-1.1, P = 0.11)]. PFS was comparable in both groups of patients with recurrent disease [HR 0.94 (0.5-1.79), P = 0.85]. However, in patients with de novo metastatic disease, the difference in favor of the taxane group was pronounced [HR 0.4 (0.2-0.78), P = 0.007] and maintained significance on multivariate analysis [HR 0.46 (0.2-0.97, P = 0.04)]. There was no statistical significant difference in OS in the whole cohort [HR 0.69 (0.39-1.23)] or the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer had similar survival with first-line treatment of taxane or vinorelbine combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. When the analysis was adjusted for prognostic factors, there was no PFS benefit for taxanes except in the subgroup with de novo disease.

Symptom cluster of emotional distress, fatigue and cognitive difficulties among young and older breast cancer survivors: The mediating role of subjective stress.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the nature of the symptom cluster of emotional distress, fatigue, and cognitive difficulties in young and older breast cancer survivors (BCS); To assess the mediating role of subjective stress and coping strategies (emotional control and meaning-focused coping) in the association between age and symptom cluster. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were 170 BCS, stages I-III, 1-12 months post-chemotherapy, filled-out the Fatigue, Emotional Control, Meaning-focused Coping, Emotional Distress and the Cognitive Difficulties Questionnaires. Statistical analyses included tests for difference between-groups Pearson correlations and Structural Equation Modeling for the assessment of the study model. RESULTS: Older BCS (aged 60-82) reported lower levels of emotional distress (M = 0.87, SD = 0.87), fatigue (M = 3.85, SD = 2.38), and cognitive difficulties (M = 1.17, SD = 1.07) compared to the younger BCS (aged 24-59) (emotional distress M = 1.17, SD = 0.85, fatigue M = 5.02, SD = 2.32, and cognitive difficulties M = 1.66, SD = 1.23, p < .01-,05). The older survivors reported lower levels of subjective stress and used more emotional control strategies compared to the younger BCS. The empirical model had good fit indices (χ2 = 27.60, p = 0.20, χ2/df = 1.26; CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.98; NFI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.04 (90% CI = 0.00, 10) and showed that subjective stress, but not coping strategies, mediated the effect of age on symptom cluster severity. CONCLUSIONS: Lower levels of subjective stress, but not coping strategies, mediated the association of age with the symptom cluster of emotional distress, fatigue and cognitive difficulties. Further research is needed to explore differences in subjective stress by age.

Evaluation of tolerability and efficacy of incorporating carboplatin in neoadjuvant anthracycline and taxane based therapy in a BRCA1 enriched triple-negative breast cancer cohort.

PURPOSE: The addition of carboplatin (Cb) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been demonstrated to improve pathologic complete response (pCR) at the expense of increased toxicity. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of dose-dense anthracycline & cyclophosphamide (ddAC) followed by weekly paclitaxel (wT) in combination with weekly Cb. METHODS: Retrospective data was collected on patients with clinical stage I-III TNBC treated with neoadjuvant ddAC-wTCb (four cycles of ddA 60 mg/m2 and ddC 600 mg/m2 every 2 weeks followed by 12 cycles of wT 80 mg/m2 with Cb AUC 1.5). Indices of tolerability and pCR were evaluated and compared to a historical cohort (n = 76) treated with ddAC-T. A secondary objective was to evaluate the rates of pCR by BRCA status. RESULTS: For 43 eligible patients, mean age was 41.5 years, 51% had clinical stage II disease, 81.4% were clinically node positive and 32.6% carried a deleterious BRCA1 mutation. Only 35% completed all scheduled doses of chemotherapy. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 42.5% of patients. Overall pCR was 51.2%; 44.8% in BRCA wild-type compared to 64.3% in BRCA-associated TNBC (p = 0.232). pCR rates with ddAC-wTCb were similar to historic institutional rates with ddAC-T (51.2% vs. 51.3%, p = 0.987) and were comparable when stratified by BRCA status. In pooled multivariate analysis, only BRCA status (HR 4.00, 95%CI 1.65-9.75, p = 0.002) was significantly associated with pCR. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant ddAC-wTCb is less tolerable in clinical practice compared to most clinical trials, with a pCR comparable to historic rates using non-platinum regimen. The role of Cb in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for BRCA mutated TNBC remains uncertain.

Identifying an optimal antiemetic regimen for patients receiving anthracycline and cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy for breast cancer--an inspection of the evidence base informing clinical decision-making.

BACKGROUND: Despite consensus recommendations for antiemetics in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline and cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy, control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains sub-optimal. OBJECTIVE: To inspect available evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT) in this population to establish treatment comparisons that have been studied, outcomes that have been reported, and the extent of study heterogeneity. Review of this data helps identify challenges for a systematic review comparing antiemetic regimens, and to identify potential future trials. METHODS: A search of Ovid MEDLINE®, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed. We sought RCTs comparing antiemetic regimens in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline and cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. We extracted information related to study design, patient characteristics and interventions compared. Patterns of outcome reporting were studied. While performing network meta-analysis was also of interest, studies were judged highly heterogeneous and it was felt findings from such work would be of uncertain validity. RESULTS: From 1062 citations, a total of 30 full texts were retained. Overall, 47 antiemetic regimens were evaluated using 15 different CINV endpoints. Treatment comparisons were diverse and many were informed by single small trials. Reporting of key endpoints was varied and all endpoints were not consistently available. Heterogeneity in patients, chemotherapies administered, and intervention doses were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of consensus recommendations for antiemetic use, we identified challenges in synthesizing the evidence base including high diversity in treatment comparisons, varied outcome reporting, and study heterogeneity. These represent challenges to identifying an optimal antiemetic regimen. Future antiemetic trials should incorporate more informed comparator selection, report patient-oriented outcomes in a standard fashion, and provide accessible data for these measures.

[THE CURRENT APPROACH TO METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA].

Renal cell carcinona is the most common kidney tumor. In Israel more than 600 cases are diagnosed annually. Risk factors for renal cell carcinoma include obesity, smoking, hypertension, and diabetes; 20-30% of the patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease, and 70-80% of patients are diagnosed with an early non-metastatic tumor. The treatment of an early non-metastatic tumor is resection. At present, the role of adjuvant systemic therapy has not been established; 20-40% of the patients operated on for an early tumor will suffer from metastatic disease recurrence. The lungs are the most common site of metastases. Renal cell carcinoma is relatively refractory to chemotherapy and radiation. In the last decade, an improved understanding of the biology of the tumor, led to the development of biologic therapies targeting specific molecular mechanisms involved in the process of the disease, and a significant expansion of treatment horizon in these patients. The biologic therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma belong to two main groups: angiogenesis inhibitors (VEGF-R inhibitors like sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib and axitinib), and inhibitors of the mTOR protein (everolimus and temsirolimus). These biologic therapies led to a significant improvement in the patients' survival. Nonetheless, these therapies are associated with a unique profile of side effects like hypertension, mucositis, and hand-foot syndrome with VEGF-R inhibitors therapy, and non-infectious pneumonitis with mTOR inhibitors therapy. The present review will focus on the modern approach to metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

The incidence and clinical impact of bone metastases in non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading global cause of cancer death. While bone metastases (BM) commonly cause morbidity, bone-targeted agent (BTA) use is variable. We investigated the incidence and impact of BM among unselected NSCLC patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all NSCLC patients seen at a single institution from January 2007 to January 2008 was performed. Various clinical and pathology data were collected. In BM patients, skeletal related events (SRE), interventions and outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: We identified 383 patients; median age 68 (IQR 60-76); 54% female. Initially 156 patients (41%) were treated with curative intent of whom 91 subsequently relapsed; 227 (59%) were considered palliative from time of diagnosis, including 22 with early stage disease not amenable to radical therapy. Of 296 patients with advanced NSCLC, common metastatic sites were: lung/pleura (80%), mediastinal nodes (69%), bone (39%), brain (30%), and liver (24%). Of 118 patients with BM, 69 (59%) had ≥1 SREs (range 1-18). Common SREs were radiotherapy (63%), pathologic fractures (22%), spinal cord compression (6%) or surgery to bone (5%). Opioid analgesia was required in 69% of BM patients, only 6% of patients with BM received BTA. Overall survival (OS) in pts with mNSCLC was 7.3 months (IQR 3.1-20.5). Pts with BM had significantly shorter OS compared to those without BM (5.8 versus 10.2 months, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: BM are common in patients with advanced NSCLC and associated with shorter survival. In this cohort, despite SREs occurred in many patients, BTA were rarely used.

Evaluating the feasibility of performing window of opportunity trials in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The waiting period to surgery represents a valuable "window of opportunity" to evaluate novel therapeutic strategies. Interventional studies performed during this period require significant multidisciplinary collaboration to overcome logistical hurdles. We undertook a one-year prospective window of opportunity study to assess feasibility. METHODS: Eligible newly diagnosed postmenopausal, estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients awaiting primary surgery received anastrozole daily until surgery. Feasibility was assessed by (a) the proportion of patients who consented and (b) completed the study. Comparison of pre- and poststudy Ki67 labelling index and cleaved caspase 3 scores (CC3) was performed. RESULTS: 22/131 (16.8%) patients were confirmed eligible and 20/22 (91%) patients completed the study. 19/20 (95%) patients agreed to undergo optional additional tissue biopsies. The mean duration of anastrozole use was 24.7 (15-44) days. There were a statistically significant decline in mean Ki67 indices of 48.8% (p < 0.001) and a trend towards significance in the decline of CC3 (p = 0.17) when comparing pre- with posttreatment values. CONCLUSION: window of opportunity trials in breast cancer are a feasible way of assessing the biologic efficacy of different therapies in the presurgical setting. The majority of eligible women were willing to participate including undergoing additional tissue biopsies.

A phase II, multicentre trial evaluating the efficacy of de-escalated bisphosphonate therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients at low-risk of skeletal-related events.

The optimal frequency of intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate administration is unclear. We thus performed a study evaluating the effects of switching from 3-4 to 12 weekly therapy in patients with biochemically defined low-risk bone metastases. Patients with serum C-telopeptide (CTx) levels ≤600 ng/L after ≥3 months of 3-4 weekly IV pamidronate were switched to 12 weekly therapy for 48 weeks. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients maintaining CTx levels in the lower-risk range. All endpoints (serum CTx and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), skeletal-related events (SREs) and self-reported pain) were measured at baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks. Treatment failure was defined as biochemical failure (CTx > 600 ng/L) or a SRE. Exploratory biomarkers including; serum TGF-ß, activin-A, bone sialoprotein (BSP), procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide and urinary N-telopeptide (NTx) were assessed at baseline as predictors for failure to complete treatment. Seventy-one patients accrued and 43 (61 %) completed 48 weeks of de-escalated therapy. Reasons for failure to complete treatment included; biochemical failure (CTx > 600 ng/L) (n = 10, 14.1 %), on-study SRE (n = 9, 12.7 %), disease progression (n = 7, 9.9 % including death from disease [n = 1, 1.4 %]) or patient choice (n = 2, 2.8 %). Elevated baseline levels of CTx, BSAP, NTx and BSP were associated with treatment failure. The majority of patients in this biochemically defined low-risk population could switch from 3-4 weekly to 12 weekly bisphosphonate therapy with no effect on CTx levels or SREs during the 48 week study. Larger trials are required to assess the roles of biomarkers as predictors of adequacy of de-escalated therapy.

Use of conjoint analysis to assess breast cancer patient preferences for chemotherapy side effects.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate preferences associated with grade I/II and grade III/IV chemotherapy side effects among breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. We also assessed trade-offs that patients are willing to make between treatment side effects and the route and schedule of treatment administration. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer completed a one-time Web survey. Conjoint analysis was used to elicit preferences for 17 grade I/II and III/IV side effects associated with available chemotherapies and regimens. In the analysis, the risk of each side effect was increased by 5%, holding all others constant, and the respective impact on patient preferences was identified. RESULTS: A total of 102 women participated (mean age 54 ± 11). Among the grade I/II side effects, a 5% reduction in the risk of sensory neuropathy, nausea, and motor neuropathy had the highest impact on preferences. Among grade III/IV side effects, motor neuropathy, nausea/vomiting, and myalgia made the most difference. An oral twice-daily regimen was most preferred; however, patients were willing to receive an intravenous regimen relative to oral to avoid an increased risk of 5% in the majority of side effects. Avoiding an increased chance of grade III/IV motor neuropathy was associated with willingness to tolerate one of the least preferred administration schedules. CONCLUSION: This study identified relative preferences among both mild/moderate to severe side effects from the patient perspective. Patients appear to be willing to make trade-offs between side effects and different regimens. These findings may help to inform medical decision-making processes.

Bone-Targeted Agents for the Management of Breast Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases.

Despite advances in adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, bone remains the most common site of recurrence. The goal of therapy for these patients is palliative and focused on maximizing the duration and quality of their life, while concurrently minimizing any disease or treatment-related complications. Bone metastases predispose patients to reduced survival, pain, impaired quality of life and the development of skeletal-related events. With an increased understanding of the pathophysiology of bone metastasis, effective treatments for their management have evolved and are now in widespread clinical use. This article will discuss the pathogenesis of bone metastases and review the key clinical evidence for the efficacy and safety of currently available systemic bone-targeted therapies in breast cancer patients with an emphasis on bisphosphonates and the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) inhibitors. We will also discuss novel strategies and therapies currently in development.

Incidence and consequences of bone metastases in lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases (BM) are common in NSCLC patients. Despite some potential positive effects of bone-targeted therapies, their use in NSCLC is infrequent, which may relate to the overall poor prognosis of advanced lung cancer. We reviewed the literature to evaluate the incidence, consequences and use of bone-targeting agents in lung cancer patients with BM in both the trial and non-trial clinical setting. METHODS: Published prospective and retrospective papers investigating lung cancer and BM, in trial and non-trial settings, were identified and are discussed in this review. RESULTS: BM are common in patients with advanced lung cancer and often present symptomatically with pain and skeletal related events (SREs). Patients with high bone turnover marker levels, multiple BM, and history of pathological fractures have shorter overall survival. In randomized studies bone-targeted therapies reduced the risk of SREs and prolonged the time to first SRE. The use of bone-targeted agents may also be associated with a survival benefit. CONCLUSION: BM are a common problem in advanced lung cancer. While the benefits of bone-targeted therapies have been demonstrated, their use is limited in non-trial populations. If better predictive markers of individual risk were available this might increase the appropriate use of bone-targeted agents.

Oral care and the use of bone-targeted agents in patients with metastatic cancers: A practical guide for dental surgeons and oncologists.

BACKGROUND: Bone-targeted agents such as bisphosphonates and the RANKL antibody have revolutionised the care of patients with bone metastases. There has, however been increasing concern about the oral health of these patients and in particular osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), especially with the increasing use of these agents at higher potencies for greater periods of time. METHODS: A review of the published data in PubMed and meeting abstracts was performed to examine incidence, risk factors, pathogenesis, clinical course and management of osteonecrosis of the jaw with focus on cancer patients treated with bone-targeted agents (BTA) for bone metastases. This manuscript takes the most frequent and pertinent questions raised by oncologists, dentists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons and tries to give a pragmatic overview of the literature. RESULTS: The incidence of ONJ varies depending on types of bone-targeted agents, duration of treatment and additional risk factors. The causes and pathogenesis of ONJ is not fully elucidated, however bone-targeted therapy induced impaired bone remodelling, microtrauma secondary to jaw activity, and oral bacterial infection seem to be important factors. Since the treatment options for ONJ are limited and not well established, preventive strategies have to be included in patients management. CONCLUSIONS: Many unanswered questions remain about the optimal oral care of patients receiving bone-targeted agents. Prospective data collection will remedy this and help to provide practical guidelines for the management and treatment of those patients that require dental intervention.

Bone-targeted agent use for bone metastases from breast cancer and prostate cancer: A patient survey.

BACKGROUND: In order to design studies assessing the optimal use of bone-targeted agents (BTAs) patient input is clearly desirable. METHODS: Patients who were receiving a BTA for metastatic prostate or breast cancer were surveyed at two Canadian cancer centres. Statistical analysis of respondent data was performed to establish relevant proportions of patient responses. RESULTS: Responses were received from 141 patients, 76 (53.9%) with prostate cancer and 65 (46.1%) with breast cancer. Duration of BTA use was <3 months (15.9%) to >24 months (35.2%). Patients were uncertain how long they would remain on a BTA. While most felt their BTA was given to reduce the chance of bone fractures (77%), 52% thought it would slow tumour growth. Prostate patients were more likely to receive denosumab and breast cancer patients, pamidronate. There was more variability in the dosing interval for breast cancer patients. Given a choice, most patients (49-57%) would prefer injection therapy to oral therapy (21-23%). Most patients (58-64%) were interested in enrolling in clinical trials of de-escalated therapy. CONCLUSION: While there were clear differences in the types of BTAs patients received, our survey showed similarity for both prostate and breast cancer patients with respect to their perceptions of the goals of therapy. Patients were interested in participating in trials of de-escalated therapy. However, given that patients receive a range of agents for varying periods of time and in different locations (e.g. hospital vs. home), the design of future trials will need to be pragmatic to reflect this.

Effects of de-escalated bisphosphonate therapy on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Pain, Brief Pain Inventory and bone biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Pain (FACT-BP) are commonly used measures of patient reported pain outcomes. We report on the performance of the FACT-BP in comparison to the BPI within a small, randomized trial. METHODS: Patients with biochemically defined low risk bone metastases were randomized to 4 weekly (control arm) or 12 weekly (de-escalating arm) pamidronate for 1 year. FACT-BP, BPI and serum markers of bone turnover were recorded at baseline and weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48. Mixed effects models were used to compare scores over time between arms. Correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the association between FACT-BP and BPI scores, as well as with markers of bone turnover. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were randomized to each study arm. Pain scores determined by the two instruments were moderately to highly correlated with each other. Baseline C-telopeptide (CTx) level was correlated with baseline FACT-BP and BPI scores. Baseline bone-specific alkaline phosphatase showed a non-significant association with pain scores. There were no correlations between the markers of bone turnover and pain scores at week 12. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study the FACT-BP and BPI correlated well with each other, and with baseline CTx. The possibility of linking subjective pain scores with objective biomarkers of response requires more investigation.

Does estrogen play a role in response to adjuvant bone-targeted therapies?

Bone remains the most common site of breast cancer recurrence. The results of population studies, pre-clinical research and clinical studies in patients with metastatic disease provided a rationale for testing bone-targeted agents in the adjuvant setting. Despite the initial optimism, results from eight prospectively designed, randomized control studies powered to assess the value of adjuvant bone-targeted therapy in early breast cancer are conflicting. Data have shown that, where benefit exists, it tends to be in women with a "low estrogen environment", either through menopause or suppression of ovarian function. In this manuscript, we review clinical data supporting the hypothesis that estrogen levels may play a part in explaining the response of patients to bone-targeted agents in the adjuvant setting. The results presented to date suggest that there may be data supporting a unifying role for estrogen in adjuvant trials. However, in the absence of any prospective randomized trials in which estrogen data has been systematically collected we cannot specifically answer this question. We await the results of the Oxford overview analysis of individual patient data with interest.

Clinical responses in a phase II study using adoptive transfer of short-term cultured tumor infiltration lymphocytes in metastatic melanoma patients.

PURPOSE: Adoptive cell therapy with autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has shown promising results in metastatic melanoma patients. Although objective response rates of over 50% have been reported, disadvantages of this approach are the labor-intensive TIL production and a very high drop-out rate of enrolled patients, limiting its widespread applicability. Previous studies showed a clear correlation between short TIL culture periods and clinical response. Therefore, we used a new TIL production technique using unselected, minimally cultured, bulk TIL (Young-TIL). The use of Young-TIL is not restricted to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2 patients. The purpose of this study is to explore the efficacy and toxicity of adoptively transferred Young-TIL following lympho-depleting chemotherapy in metastatic melanoma patients, refractory to interleukin-2 and chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Young-TIL cultures for 90% of the patients were successfully generated, enabling the treatment of most enrolled patients. We report here the results of 20 evaluated patients. RESULTS: Fifty percent of the patients achieved an objective clinical response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, including two ongoing complete remissions (20+, 4+ months) and eight partial responses (progression-free survival: 18+, 13+, 10+, 9, 6+, 4, 3+, and 3 months). All responders are currently alive. Four additional patients showed disease stabilization. Side effects were transient and manageable. CONCLUSION: We showed that lympho-depleting chemotherapy followed by transfer of short-term cultured TIL can mediate tumor regression in 50% of metastatic melanoma with manageable toxicity. The convincing clinical results combined with the simplification of the process may thus have a major effect on cell therapy of cancer.

Minimally cultured or selected autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes after a lympho-depleting chemotherapy regimen in metastatic melanoma patients.

Adoptive cell therapy with autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2), after nonmyeloablative chemotherapy, has been shown to result in tumor regression in half of refractory metastatic melanoma patients. In the present study, we describe 2 separate clinical protocols. Twelve patients were treated with "Selected"-TIL, as previously reported and 8 patients with the modified version of "Young"-TIL. Selected-TIL protocol required the establishment of multiple T-cell cultures from 1 patient and in vitro selection of cultures secreting interferon-gamma upon antigenic stimulation. In contrast, Young-TIL are minimally cultured T cells with superior in vitro features that do not require further selection. Two of 12 Selected-TIL patients experienced objective clinical responses (1 complete response, 1 partial response). Out of 8 treated Young-TIL patients, 1 experienced complete response, 2 partial response, and 4 patients had disease stabilization. Twenty-one of 33 enrolled Selected-TIL patients were excluded from the protocol, mainly as cultures failed the interferon-gamma selection criteria or due to clinical deterioration, compared with only 3 Young-TIL patients. Expected bone marrow suppression and high-dose IL-2 toxicity were transient. There was no treatment-related mortality. This study vindicates the feasibility and effectiveness of TIL technology and calls for further efforts to implement and enhance this modality. The use of minimally cultured, unselected Young-TIL enables the treatment of most enrolled patients. Although the cohort of Young-TIL patients treated so far is rather small and the follow-up short, the response rate is encouraging.